Intellectual Property Rights (Cross Border Measures)
Revision No. 38 - Last Updated : 09-10-2002
|
Quick Reference: (Click on any link in the table to go straight to the relevant paragraph) |
||
|
Prohibition
of goods infringing intellectual property rights |
||
|
|
||
In line with Malta’s present commitments after signing the
World Trade Agreement that incorporated the TRIPS Agreement, the Intellectual
Property Rights (Cross-Border Measures) Act (Act VIII of 2000) was enacted in
February, 2000, which lays down a series of measures to curb the importation
into Malta and the exportation from Malta of goods infringing intellectual
property rights, including counterfeit and pirated goods.

The Act provides that the entry into Malta, export or
re-export, release for free circulation, temporary importation, placing in a
free zone or free warehouse, of:
·
counterfeit goods (including the packaging thereof);
·
goods which bear, without authorisation, a trade mark or
trade mark symbol which is identical (or which cannot be distinguished in its
essential aspects) to a validly registered trade mark in respect of the same
type of goods and which infringe the trade mark holder’s rights under Maltese
law;
·
pirated goods; and
·
goods infringing a patent under Maltese law,
is prohibited.

Any rightholder whose rights have been infringed in any one
of the situations referred to above may request the Comptroller of Customs, by
application in writing, to withhold the release of the goods pending the
initiation of civil judicial proceedings by the rightholder.
For a list of details and documentation such application
must contain please refer to Appendix
I.
All expenses to cover the administrative costs involved
shall be borne by the applicant.
The Comptroller of Customs may require an applicant whose
application has been granted to provide security in order to:
·
indemnify the Comptroller of Customs against any
liability he may incur in virtue of the acceptance of the application; and
·
ensure payment of the administrative costs involved.
In the eventuality that the Comptroller of Customs refuses
to accept any such application, the applicant may appeal to the Minister
against such refusal within 3 working days of notice to him of such refusal
which must state the reasons for the refusal.

If such an application is granted and the goods detained by
the Comptroller of Customs, the applicant has 10 working days after
notification of notice of detention of such goods to institute civil judicial
proceedings on the merits. In default,
the goods shall be released. The
Comptroller of Customs must be duly and promptly notified of the initiation of
such civil proceedings.
The period of 10 working days may be prolonged by a further
10 days by application in writing upon sufficient grounds being shown.

The Comptroller of Customs may, in the course of routine
checks, if it appears prima facie evident to him that certain goods are
infringing the rights of an intellectual property rightholder, notify such
rightholder of the possible infringement.
The Comptroller of Customs may suspend release of or detain
such goods for up to 5 working days to enable the rightholder to lodge an
application as detailed above.

The Comptroller of Customs shall, at the request of the
applicant and subject to the terms of any laws governing secrecy of commercial
and industrial data, inform such applicant of the names and addresses of the
importer/consignee, exporter, manufacturer and/or owner of the infringing
goods, as the case may be, and of the quantity of the goods in question.
The applicant shall also be allowed to inspect such goods.

Provided civil judicial proceedings have been initiated by
the rightholder within the time period of 10 working days as detailed above and
all Customs formalities have been completed, the owner, importer or the
consignee of goods suspected of infringing patents or design rights will have
to provide sufficient security to protect the interests of the rightholder
before obtaining the release of the goods in question.
Such security may be either in the form of a deposit made to
the Comptroller of Customs or of a bank guarantee of such amount as may be
determined by him.

If the outcome of the civil judicial proceedings initiated
as detailed above is favourable to the rightholder, the Courts shall:
·
order the Comptroller of Customs to dispose of outside
the channels of commerce or destroy altogether the goods without compensation
of any sort to and, at the cost of, the importer, exporter or owner of such
goods, as the case may be; and
·
after having regard to all the circumstances of the
case and, in particular, to what the justice of the case requires, take, or
order the Comptroller of Customs to take, any other measures having the effect
of depriving the persons concerned of the economic benefits of the
infringement.

In addition to the civil remedies, there are also criminal
penalties for persons who import or cause to be imported goods which infringe
intellectual property rights.
Accordingly, any such persons shall be liable to a fine
equivalent to double the value of the goods.

If it results that the party at whose instance the enforcement procedures as detailed above were instituted has abused of such proceedings, the Court may order such party to provide adequate compensation for damages suffered by the party wrongfully enjoined or restrained.

· This Document in PDF Format.
· Appendix 1 : Information and documentation required in order to file an application under the Act
· Appendix 2 : Power of Attorney
· Appendix 3: Request for Disclosure